Template talk:Class guides: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Re-arrangement? |
m Followup |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Re-arrangement == | |||
I had an idea to arrange the classes in a more comp-relevant grouping than the default (Offensive, Defensive, Support) to make the template more competitive-centric. I'm not sure what the re-arrangement would be, and the fact that there is no 'concrete' grouping for the classes in competitive play leads me to believe that any sort of re-arrangement would be too alienating even for experienced comp players. Then again, if we re-group the classes to fit competitive play, it could become the basis for a competitive grouping of the 9 classes. Thinking out loud at this point :] --[[User:Garlic|garlic]] ([[User talk:Garlic|talk]]) 08:03, 6 February 2016 (UTC) | I had an idea to arrange the classes in a more comp-relevant grouping than the default (Offensive, Defensive, Support) to make the template more competitive-centric. I'm not sure what the re-arrangement would be, and the fact that there is no 'concrete' grouping for the classes in competitive play leads me to believe that any sort of re-arrangement would be too alienating even for experienced comp players. Then again, if we re-group the classes to fit competitive play, it could become the basis for a competitive grouping of the 9 classes. Thinking out loud at this point :] --[[User:Garlic|garlic]] ([[User talk:Garlic|talk]]) 08:03, 6 February 2016 (UTC) | ||
:Followup: The Official TF2 Wiki lists a competitive grouping as: | |||
:*Core Classes | |||
:**Medic | |||
:**Demoman | |||
:*Default Classes | |||
:**Soldier | |||
:**Scout | |||
:*Situational Classes | |||
:**Pyro | |||
:**Heavy | |||
:**Engineer | |||
:**Sniper | |||
:**Spy | |||
:This is used on the wiki as a navbox at the bottom of each class' competitive pages. Obviously it is quite 6v6 favoured. --[[User:Garlic|garlic]] ([[User talk:Garlic|talk]]) 08:38, 6 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 08:38, 6 February 2016
Re-arrangement[edit source]
I had an idea to arrange the classes in a more comp-relevant grouping than the default (Offensive, Defensive, Support) to make the template more competitive-centric. I'm not sure what the re-arrangement would be, and the fact that there is no 'concrete' grouping for the classes in competitive play leads me to believe that any sort of re-arrangement would be too alienating even for experienced comp players. Then again, if we re-group the classes to fit competitive play, it could become the basis for a competitive grouping of the 9 classes. Thinking out loud at this point :] --garlic (talk) 08:03, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Followup: The Official TF2 Wiki lists a competitive grouping as:
- Core Classes
- Medic
- Demoman
- Default Classes
- Soldier
- Scout
- Situational Classes
- Pyro
- Heavy
- Engineer
- Sniper
- Spy
- Core Classes
- This is used on the wiki as a navbox at the bottom of each class' competitive pages. Obviously it is quite 6v6 favoured. --garlic (talk) 08:38, 6 February 2016 (UTC)